Moderator: Moderators
JonathanF wrote:By the way, what's the solutions' naming convention for this competition?
JonathanF-55*-WOW
JonathanF-55(price)-WOW
JonathanF-price(55)-WOW
*I'm not really at 55, don't be worried
?rjan Flatseth wrote:15 Lait, so far. This is a very cool concept. only 200? is not much though
Will entries that costs over 200 be considered dark or completely disqualified?
snowlord wrote:Ikerous wrote:I think a spending limit really forces ingenuity.
I think the spending limit really displays my stupidity...
snowlord wrote:It's very interesting though, to see that there are many ways to build a better thrower than an unsupported rubber cannon as long as there is an anchor.
Ikerous wrote:A cheap method of getting the ball across the screen can come in handy (Especially a light one)
dudiobugtron wrote:Ikerous wrote:A cheap method of getting the ball across the screen can come in handy (Especially a light one)
True - but in most levels you aren't limited to 1 anchor point (and no ability to build half-way mechanisms)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests