V4nKw15h wrote:Yikes Mark. What did you do? Haha. (Do you want some tips?)
I bumped it up to 1333 and thought that was still seriously low.
I'll leave it with Votarts 1444 now until we have a few more players declaring better scores than that.
I've done a solution with virtually no random bounces or collisions and got 1316, I may be able to swap a few materials around, especially in the catchers, but that would only add about 50. All of the Dillo's are guided so the solution is clean as a whistle, but
very expensive.
These types of levels are good fun but we have had quite a run of them and I am starting to get a little uninspired by having to use 50% random luck rather than a 100% calculated solution over and over again. This is not a complaint against this level or any of the previous ones, just my opinion on how the contests have been recently.
Don't worry though, I will be trying my best to get a better solution for this one
.