ARFC_B_CIV_4-Directions (ends Sept. 12 @15:00GMT)

[JimCDubb]

Welcome to the "B" League competition #104, 4 Directions.

This is my first host (thanks, V4nKw15h), so if my level looks like something you may have seen in the past, my apologies. It is not intentional, although I think the level is open for a lot of creative versatility. Hope it's not too easy. Be honest, but gentle.

You must move the 'dillo both left and right, and both up and down to complete the level, thus the name, 4 Directions. No special rules apply.

Posting scores is allowed.

Competition closes on Sept. 12 @ 15:00GMT.
GMT Time link: http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/

Submissions to JimCDubb@aol.com or PM.

Naming convention is:
[DollarsRemaining]-[YourForumName]-[SolutionName]

Example:
999-Me-Mine

Good Luck!

[TSchultz]

I guess I'll start the bidding off at 860+L. My catcher design is very bad...
Nice simple level
Probably would be more fitting for A league though.

[mikee7]

Hmmm... barely reached 860+ and i can't tweak it anymore

[TSchultz]

Hmmm... barely reached 860+ and i can't tweak it anymore

Same. I barely was able to tweak mine.

[mikee7]

Whats up?!
Nobody else working on this project?

[Cresta]

870+

[JimCDubb]

Guys,
Since we have 4 days left, I was wondering if this contest needs to be spiced up a little. My idea is that the level needs to be solved 2 ways, by moving the dillo around the top and another solution moving the dillo around the bottom. I could award a medal for the best average of both solutions, or give individuals for each. What do you guys think? I would like to have everyone agree before we change it.

[mikee7]

That sounds great, altough i didn't try the upper version, and that's the harder one

[Cresta]

That sounds great, altough i didn't try the upper version, and that's the harder one

Under is simpler?
I have 870++ passing on the top..

[TSchultz]

I think upper is definitely simpler... same as Cresta (1870++ too).

[ioncorpse]

I have a good catcher, but bad louncher Don't like such levels...
871+

[mikee7]

Hmmm... interesting!
I have already 1870+ under, but only 1860+ over the top, but with a little work and tweaking i see also 1870+, but the question is is it worth(should we take the average $ or not?)

[JimCDubb]

Looks like we have some good competition between over and under.
Maybe we don't need to go with an everage of both. One for each, or one for best?
Only 2 days left now. I'll go with the majority.

Edit:
If it's OK with you guys,I'll just award 1 medal for the best over-the-top score and 1 medal for the best around-the-bottom score, as long as it's not the same person.
And as long as that isn't against the contest rules.