Page 3 of 3

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:35 pm
by dudiobugtron
luka1222 wrote:see cheesecake thats a better debate to have, is it a cake or some sort of pie?


Or maybe, pie is just a sort of cake anyway. Mmmm, mince and cheesecake.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:40 pm
by luka1222
no see you could never call a chicken pie a cake, same as you could never call an ice bun a pie. so they cant be the same thing. it seems to me that a pie has a pastry exterior filled with luvly goodness, so cheese cake could be a pie :shock:

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:59 pm
by dudiobugtron
luka1222 wrote:a pie has a pastry exterior filled with luvly goodness, so cheese cake could be a pie :shock:


Actually, a cheesecake has a cookie base, not a pastry base.

However, I think they should make apricot pie etc... with a cookie base. Damn that would be nice.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:14 pm
by mark_man
My wife loves a good muffin :!:

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:21 pm
by dudiobugtron
OK, I am now convinced; according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheesecake:

"A cheesecake is a sweet, cheese-based pie"

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:33 am
by luka1222
AH HA! I KNEW IT :)

MARKMAN YOU DIRTY OLD MAN

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:50 am
by mark_man
Hairy pie LOL

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:58 am
by ?rjan Flatseth
I see there are many good views about the dark/light issue here. Unfortunaly I have not much time to take part of the debate right now. I think there may be reasons to give Ioncorpse a bedal too, as he had had the same score without the bar that he thought necessarily to make it light.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:16 pm
by mark_man
Back on topic .I think the medal went to the wrong person the rules state you are not to explode parts and as it was an active part of the solution weather it affected the outcome or not then as stated by the rule it would have to be deemed dark.So yes an additional medal would be an answer in this one.

In sport we have referees judges etc .These people have varying interpretations of the rules to some degree and the also have to decide one way or another the outcome of a infringement/goal etc.


So what i think I'm trying to say is we know the rules we play by them but in the end of the day the final decision has to be down to the comp runner and his interpretation on the day. :D IMO

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:20 pm
by luka1222
mark_man wrote:Back on topic .I think the medal went to the wrong person the rules state you are not to explode parts and as it was an active part of the solution weather it affected the outcome or not then as stated by the rule it would have to be deemed dark.So yes an additional medal would be an answer in this one.

In sport we have referees judges etc .These people have varying interpretations of the rules to some degree and the also have to decide one way or another the outcome of a infringement/goal etc.


So what i think I'm trying to say is we know the rules we play by them but in the end of the day the final decision has to be down to the comp runner and his interpretation on the day. :D IMO

i agree,

but not the hairy part :D

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:43 pm
by dudiobugtron
mark_man wrote:Back on topic .I think the medal went to the wrong person the rules state you are not to explode parts and as it was an active part of the solution weather it affected the outcome or not then as stated by the rule it would have to be deemed dark.So yes an additional medal would be an answer in this one


I think that if the rules say that exploding something by overlapping endpoints (even if it doesn't help you!) is always dark, then I think the rules should be changed.
However I don't agree that the rules mean that.


Your ref analogy is good though. Maybe we need louder appeals!!!

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:43 pm
by mark_man
dudiobugtron wrote:
mark_man wrote:Back on topic .I think the medal went to the wrong person the rules state you are not to explode parts and as it was an active part of the solution weather it affected the outcome or not then as stated by the rule it would have to be deemed dark.So yes an additional medal would be an answer in this one


I think that if the rules say that exploding something by overlapping endpoints (even if it doesn't help you!) is always dark, then I think the rules should be changed.
However I don't agree that the rules mean that.


Your ref analogy is good though. Maybe we need louder appeals!!!

Taken from the rules :-exploding pieces by intersecting materials and endnodes, will win the Dark Force prize if they score higher than the best light solution.
We are IMOing so i would have given Ikerous, a PM before the end of the comp to clarify light or dark. If light then i would have told him that under the circumstances i.e similar entry but without dowts light, he would have to re submit a light solution .IMO
So the best way forward for a situation like this,has to be level makers decision is final. :D